Well....Bush actually accomplished something....Ban on Partial Birth Abortions

I hope that our readers are clear that despite our conservative leanings here at Afronerd, we are not apologists for the ineptness of the Bush administration. And we're are also not prone to extreme religiosity-which appears to be promulgated by those in the evangelical arm of the neoconservative spectrum. But I do believe that yesterday's Supreme court ruling, banning partial birth abortions was moral, sound and humane. Do I believe that women have the right to control their bodies? Yes. But there does have to be a determination as to what constitutes life. As a zygote...perhaps not. But as a partially formed being....yes. Here's a excerpt from The Independent regarding yesterday's ruling:

Bush's court delivers US abortion ban
By Andrew Gumbel in Los Angeles
Published: 19 April 2007
George Bush's new, conservative Supreme Court delivered a victory to anti-abortion activists yesterday when it upheld the so-called Partial Birth Abortion Act, which outlaws a specific, relatively rare procedure usually carried out on pregnant women reaching the end of the second trimester.

The issue has been mired in controversy for years, with anti-abortion activists arguing that the operation, which involves crushing the foetus's head, is unspeakably barbaric while their opponents say it can, in certain circumstances, be the least traumatic way of ending a pregnancy and causing least damage to the health of the mother.

Six courts have ruled that the 2003 federal law banning the procedure was unconstitutional because it did not provide an exception to protect the life and health of the mother. It seems likely that the Supreme Court would have made a similar ruling until last year, when Sandra Day O'Connor retired and was replaced by Samuel Alito, a hardline conservative. That change shifted the balance on the Court to a 5-4 majority generally hostile towards abortion laws. Before Justice Alito's appointment, John Roberts, a conservative, replaced the late William Rehnquist as Chief Justice.

The ruling yesterday was widely expected, but that made it no less likely to restoke the fires of the abortion debate and heighten speculation that this Supreme Court might one day strike down Roe vs Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling that gave women the constitutional right to seek an abortion in the first place.

Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy said the procedure was "laden with the power to devalue human life" and was likely to traumatise women who underwent it.

Justice Kennedy also pointed out that other late-pregnancy abortion procedures were available, so banning "intact dilation and extraction" - known only to its opponents as partial-birth abortion - did not necessarily close medical doors in dire circumstances.

For more on this story, click on the link below:

Bush's court delivers US abortion ban